SEAB TF Meeting Announced

Subject: UFTO Note – SEAB TF Meeting Announced
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 15:51:51 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth <edbeards@ufto.com>

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| http://www.ufto.com edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

Here is the official announcement of the first meeting of the SEAB Task Force on Reliability, adapted from the Federal Register of Dec 30.

Note that the meeting is open, and public participation is permitted.

——————————————–
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board
Electric System Reliability Task Force

Thursday, January 16, 1997, 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM

JW Marriott Hotel
Capital Ballroom – Salon E
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard C. Burrow
Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (AB-1)
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
(202) 586-1709 richard.burrow@hq.doe.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The electric power industry is in the midst of a complex transition to competition, which will induce many far-reaching changes in the structure of the industry and the institutions which regulate it. This transition raises many reliability issues, as new entities emerge in the power markets and as generation becomes less integrated with transmission.

Purpose of the Task Force: The purpose of the Electric System Reliability Task Force is to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board regarding the critical institutional, technical, and policy issues that need to be addressed in order to maintain the reliability of the nation’s bulk electric system in the context of a more competitive industry.

Subject: UFTO Note – SEAB TF Meeting Announced Page 2 of 2
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 15:51:51 -0800

Tentative Agenda

8:30 – 9:15 Opening Remarks
Hazel R. O’Leary, Secretary of Energy
Bob Hanfling, Chairman, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board
Phil Sharp, Chairman, Electric System Reliability Task Force

9:15 – 9:30 Task Force Member Introductions

9:30 – 9:45 Break

9:45 – 10:30 Institutional Reliability Issues
Mike Gent, National Electric Reliability Council

10:30 – 11:15 Technical Reliability Issues
Karl Stahlkopf, Electric Power Research Institute

11:15 – 11:45 State Reliability Perspectives
Duncan Kincheloe, Missouri Public Utility Commission

11:45 – 1:00 Lunch

1:00 – 1:30 Federal Policy Issues
Charles B. Curtis, Deputy Secretary of Energy

1:30 – 2:00 Public Comment

2:00 – 4:30 Development of a Task Force Work Plan

4:30 Adjourn

This tentative agenda is subject to change.

The final agenda will be available at the meeting. Public Participation: The Chairman of the Task Force is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will, in the Chairman’s judgment, facilitate the orderly conduct of business. During its meeting in Washington, D.C. the Task Force welcomes public comment. Members of the public will be heard in the order in which they sign up at the beginning of the meeting. The Task Force will make every effort to hear the views of all interested parties. Written comments may be submitted to David Cheney, Acting Executive Director, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, AB-1, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585.

Minutes: Minutes and a transcript of the meeting will be available for public review and copying approximately 30 days following the meeting at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190 Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, between 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays.

December 20, 1996

Happy New Year (& Electric Carpets)

Subject: UFTO Happy New Year (& Electric Carpets)
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 12:19:58 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| http://www.ufto.com edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

Happy New Year!

This is a quick note to say hello as we begin the new year.

1996 has been exciting.
– Participation in UFTO is at an all time high
– Email has replaced virtually all hard copy correspondence
– The web site is operational
– We held a ground-breaking workshop with the national labs
– We’re closely coupled into the workings of the new DOE Task Force on
Reliability
– Many of you are pursuing programs and deals with various labs and
startups.

I look forward to finding new and better ways to make UFTO valuable and important to you and your company.

As you know, I’m constantly on the lookout for significant new developments, technologies, and opportunities to bring to your attention. These stories can come from networking with our friends at the National Labs, from accidental encounters with stories in magazines, the press or the internet, or from other personal and professional contacts.

What makes UFTO different from other clipping services or technology newsletters? With the glut of information available, the most important difference is selectivity. Knowing your areas of strategic and technical interest, I choose things that will be worthwhile for you to review and pursue, or pass along to others in your company.

Second, in most cases I make inquiries and establish contact with the technology developers. This way, we not only get a sense what’s behind the “press release”, but we also begin a relationship that puts us in a preferred position for further dealings.

Please tell me how well this is working for you, and whether you would rather have me be more or less selective in the future, or if there are areas you’d particularly like to focus on in ’97.

———————————————–

And now, for something completely different:
Here is a story I saw on the web a few days ago. We’ve all heard of magic carpets and electric blankets (and electric vehicles), but the idea of an electric carpet caught me completely by surprise–have you ever heard of it? It would seem they are a common item in Japan. Wonder if/when they’ll show up in this country…(I haven’t made contacts on this one)..

——————————————
ANALYSIS/ Efficient electric carpets win popularity
Product Spotlight: Nikkei Marketing Journal, Dec. 26, 1996

Electric carpets have become one of the more popular alternatives for heating rooms. Makers specializing in this product are doing well, and other consumer electronics makers making efforts to develop high value-added electric carpets.

Sharp Corp.’s HJ-G20A-C, at a suggested retail price of 35,000 yen, is a popular example. The carpet requires only half the power of conventional models, and it is treated with an anti-slip coating. It comes with a beige gabardine cover. Sharp is now looking to develop even more energy-efficient models.

Matsushita Electric Works Ltd. has won over consumers with four models: the smaller DR241-A and DR241-C, both priced at 33,200 yen, and the DR341-A and DR341-C, both priced at 44,300 yen. These carpets also receive anti-slip treatments and consume only about half as much electricity as earlier models. Their insulation cushions offer improved comfort and heat-transfer capability. Matsushita developed a gabardine cover (in blue or beige) with a cashmere-like feel that has proven very popular. The firm plans to develop other, larger carpets with similar features.

Toshiba Home Technology Corp. employs a two-layer insulating material on the bottom of the heating element of its offerings. The carpets reduce heat loss through the floor by about 30%, lowering power consumption by about 25%. The company offers one mode in which it uses only about one-fourth the electricity of conventional electric carpets. Toshiba’s CK-20FS (C) and CK-20FS (CT) are both popular. They have a mainly beige natural coloring with a cubic design pattern. The anti-slip carpet is made from polyester, but with a feel like cotton. Toshiba has sold more than it expected. “Our carpet’s comfort and energy-saving functions have matched consumer demands,” claimed one company official. Toshiba expects sales of the carpets this winter to increase 5% year-on-year.

Climate-Change, Fuel-Cell, Cost-Sharing, Grants

Subject: UFTO Note – Climate-Change, Fuel-Cell, Cost-Sharing, Grants
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 16:43:58 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth

Hot off the wire, from Commerce Business Daily
(I fixed a lot of typos, and split it into paragraphs.)

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| http://www.ufto.com edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

CLIMATE CHANGE FUEL CELL PROGRAM

Category: B–Special Studies and Analyses–Not R&D (PROCUREMENTS)

Date Published: December 30, 1996

Contact: US ARMY ARDEC, TACOM, AMSTA-AR-PCW-B, BLDG. 10, PICATINNY ARSENAL NJ 07806 POC Christine Bernosky email=cbernos, Contract Specialist, 201-724-2754, Paul Milenkowic, Contracting Officer,201-724-5391 (Site Code W15BW9)

Synopsis: CLIMATE CHANGE FUEL CELL PROGRAM SOL 066&&&-9612-0012 The U.S. Army ARDEC is planning a cost sharing program in the form of multiple grants in support of the Climate Change Fuel Cell Program. This program involves using fuel cells in power plants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the efficient use of fossil fuels. In an effort to reduce pollutants to the environment, stimulate commercialization of stationary fuel cell power plants, and utilize fuel cells in unique mission needs for DOD, Congress has established a grant program to support fuel cell demonstration projects.

The Climate Change Fuel Cell Program consists of installing, operating, and demonstrating a fuel cell. Applicants can utilize DOD or non-DOD sites; however, DOD installations must partner with a private entity. Priority will be given to those applicants who use a DOD installation. Foreign participation is limited to those entities which will provide power to a DOD facility within their national borders.

The applicant cannot be a developer of fuel cell technology or a fuel cell manufacturer, and the applicant’s chosen fuel cell power plant(s) must be manufactured in the U.S. Applicants who have existing, installed fuel cells at the site or who have placed an order for one prior to 26 September 1994 are ineligible. The applicant must identify the intended use of each power plant. Power plants purchased as factory packaged shall be full power tested prior to installation. An applicant shall identify the site (specific name of DOD installation, hospital, university, etc.) and the intended use at the time of proposal submission. Prior to installation, the specific location at the site must be identified.

The applicant may transfer the power plant to a third party for installation and operation. Prior to installation, the applicant shall be responsible for supplying local National Environmental Policy Act-related information to DOD and for assuring that its power plant(s) is (are) installed and operated in accordance with all regulatory requirements. Applicants must use a fuel cell manufacturer who has at least 2 megawatts (MW)/year manufacturing capability to support the project. Projects must be greater than 100 kilowatts (kW) and are anticipated to be below 400kW. The period of performance is three years at which time the project shall operate at a rated power.

The applicant shall provide a project schedule with each proposal. Applicants will be required to submit a summary report of the power plant installation and operational history upon successful completion of one year of power plant operation. The report will be consistent with the format provided.

The federal contribution will be $1,000/kW and shall not exceed 1/3 of the total cost of the program, including unit cost, installation, an pre-commercial operation. If partnering with a DOD installation, the remainder of the costs shall be borne by the private partner and payment of the grant will be made to the private entity. There may be multiple grants to each applicant, although Th. Government reserves the right to limit the number of plants to an applicant to provide for customer and functional diversity. Payment of 80% of the grant shall be made upon demonstrating that the unit operates at the unit’s maximum power capacity for 8 hours for the purpose identified in the project proposal. The remaining payment of 20% of the grant shall be issued upon submission of the final demonstration report. The proposal period for the Climate Control Fuel Cell Program grant ends 1 May 1997.

This Broad Agency Announcement is available from the World WideWeb Electronic Commerce Home Page called the Procurement Network (ProcNet) available at the following Web address: “http://procnet.pica.army.mil/””. (I-361 SN015533)

Ballard and GPU Joint Venture

Subject: UFTO Note – Ballard and GPU Joint Venture
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:44:23 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| http://www.ufto.com edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

Below is a recent press release on a joint venture between Ballard and GPU. Ballard also announced receiving $30 Million from the Canadian government to support commercialization of stationary fuel cell power plants. —

BALLARD POWER SYSTEMS INC. SIGNS $31.2 MILLION AGREEMENT WITH GPU INTERNATIONAL TO FORM VENTURE TO COMMERCIALIZE FUEL CELL STATIONARY POWER PLANTS

Dec. 17, 1996

Ballard Power Systems and GPU International, Inc. (GPUI), a subsidiary of GPU Inc., a major international electric company based in New Jersey, announced today that they have formed a venture for the commercialization of Fuel Cell Stationary Power Plants using the Ballard Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell.

Under the terms of the agreement, which is subject to final regulatory approval, Ballard Power Systems has created a new subsidiary, Ballard Generation Systems Inc., to commercialize Fuel Cell Stationary Power Plants. Ballard Generation Systems will develop, market and manufacture Fuel Cell Stationary Power Plants worldwide and will be based in Burnaby, B.C. Ballard Power Systems, the parent company, will supply the fuel cells for these power plants. GPU International will invest US$23.25 million (Can$31.2 million) over the next two years in the subsidiary, Ballard Generation Systems, for up to a 19.3% share of Ballard Generation Systems, two 250 kW fuel cell power plants for field trials, and non-transferrable warrants to purchase 100,000 Common shares in Ballard Power Systems at a price of $27.45 per share.

In addition to GPUI’s investment in Ballard Generation Systems, it will bring to the company its considerable expertise in world energy markets and an understanding of user requirements which will contribute to the development of Ballard Fuel Cell Stationary Power Plants.

GPU International is the non-regulated arm of GPU, Inc. GPU serves a worldwide population of over 13 million people with 4.4 million customers located in 12 countries. It had 1995 revenues of over US$3.8 billion and assets of about US$10 billion. GPU, Inc. shares are on the New York Stock Exchange.

“Under growing deregulation, Ballard Fuel Cell Stationary Power Plants will become an important part of the energy market. These power plants will provide power for a broad range of market applications including Premium Power,” said Bruce L. Levy, President and CEO of GPU International. “We see that by combining Ballard’s clear lead in proton exchange membrane fuel cells and power plants with GPU’s expertise in the world energy business, we can together build a growing, successful and profitable business.”

“We are pleased to welcome GPU as a strategic partner and investor in our stationary power business,” said Firoz Rasul, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ballard. “GPU has distinguished itself as a leader in the deregulated electric power industry worldwide and has participated in the commercialization of innovative energy products and applications. Ballard Fuel Cell Power Plants will address the needs of the substantial markets that are emerging for environmentally clean, high quality power generated at the customer’s site.”

“GPU International has made investments in power-related projects throughout the world,” said GPUI’s Levy. “We feel that fuel cell power plants will open up considerable new markets in the power business within the next 5 years.”

“To marshal the resources needed to bring each of our products to market effectively, our plan is to join forces with a carefully chosen team of marketing and manufacturing partners,” said Mossadiq Umedaly, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ballard Power Systems. “GPUI brings deep insight in the international electric power markets, which will contribute to the commercial success of Ballard Fuel Cell power plants. The equity participation by GPUI also enables Ballard to capitalize on the value of its stationary power plant technology beyond the fuel cell, and establishes the value for this subsidiary, before GPUI’s investment of $31.2 million at more than $130 million.”

Ballard Power Systems is the world leader in the development of proton exchange membrane fuel cell power systems. The heart of its products is the Ballard Fuel Cell, a proprietary zero-emission engine that converts natural gas, methanol, or hydrogen fuel into electricity without combustion. Ballard Fuel Cells are currently being used by leading international companies including Daimler-Benz, General Motors, Hitachi, Honda, Volkswagen and Volvo to develop zero-emission vehicles and clean stationary power plants.

Ballard’s Common shares are listed on The Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “BLD” and on the Nasdaq National Market System under the symbol “BLDPF”.

/For further information: Paul Lancaster, Ballard Power Systems Inc. (604) 454-0900, fax (604) 412-4700; Michael A. Lundy, Lundy Associates, Inc. (201) 660-1100, fax (201) 660-1104 or Patrick M. Dool, GPU International, Inc. (201) 263-6951, fax (201) 263-6977/ (BLD. BLDPF)

Ammonia Monitor for NOxOUT

Subject: UFTO Note — Ammonia Monitor for NOxOUT
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 15:16:53 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

Our colleagues at NEES played a key role in supporting the development of this technology to reduce reagent use in the NOxOUT process by monitoring temperature and ammonia in the stack gas. Rui Afonso, who is quoted below, would be happy to discuss their views of it with you. (Rui can be reached at 508-389-3208.)

The device is commercially available for some applications, and could be used in other applications with some additional development. Note the one-year payback mentioned below. _____________________________________________

Here is a press release from the vendor:

New England Power saves money with SpectraScan Ammonia Monitor

December 3, 1996, Salem, MA – A SpectraScan(R) Ammonia Process Monitor, manufactured by Spectrum Diagnostix of Andover, Mass., has been operating on a New England Power Company (NEPCO) coal-fired boiler. The instrument is being used to monitor a new control logic employed by Nalco Fuel Tech (NFT) of Naperville, Ill. (Spectrum Diagnostix was purchased by BOVAR Inc. of Calgary, Alberta in June 1996.)

The new control logic that NFT provided to NEPCO is designed to reduce the consumption of reagent in the NOxOUT(R) process. The control signal is an accurate temperature measurement supplied by a SpectraTemp(R) temperature monitor, also manufactured by BOVAR.

According to NEPCO, the electric utility company is expecting to recover its investment in the new control system within one year or better. NEPCO is completing a trial period to quantify the benefits of the new control system.

According to Rui Afonso, NEPCO’s Manager of R&D, “At this stage, we are extremely pleased with the results that we have seen at Salem Harbor, unit No. 3. The instruments have been reliable and responsive, and the reagent savings appear to be better than initially expected. Long-term testing, which is currently underway, will further quantify the benefits of the technology.”

According to John O’Leary, Nalco Fuel Tech’s Manager of Technical Services, “The SpectraScan(R) Ammonia Process Monitor offers real-time monitoring of ammonia slip in the high temperature, dusty, and corrosive gas streams that typically exist in coal-fired boilers. Having evaluated every ammonia analyzer we are aware of, we have been very satisfied with the performance of the SpectraScan(R) Ammonia Process Analyzer in this application. Other analyzers have not offered the response, sensitivity, interference-free analysis, and robust design that are all necessary for our use. Along with SpectraTemp(R), we expect that the SpectraScan(R) Ammonia Process Analyzer will be a key component in many of our future NOxOUT(R) systems.”

SpectraScan(R) is a Tunable Diode Laser based instrument manufactured by BOVAR Western Research. SpectraScan(R) is a highly sensitive and interference-free analyzer that has adapted recent advances in diode lasers and optical fibers to the challenge of sensing trace concentrations of gas species in either an open path (perimeter) or close-coupled (in process) configuration.

The open path version of the instrument is accepted by the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum, a consortium of major oil refiners, for monitoring fugitive toxic gases.

By using up to one kilometer of fiber optic and signal conductor to link the System Console (which houses the laser and all electronics) with as many as four measurement locations, SpectraScan(R) offers real-time and continuous, remote sensing of trace gases without the need to transport the sample.

These features also permit remote monitoring of species in hostile environments. SpectraScan(R) is currently available for monitoring HF, NH3, H2S and H2O that may be present in trace quantities in process streams or ambient air. Monitors for other gas species are under development.

SpectraTemp(R) is an optical furnace exit gas temperature monitor manufactured by BOVAR Western Research. It is used at numerous utility boilers to control soot blowers and low NOx burners to improve heat rate and increase fuel flexibility. It is also used as a portable boiler testing instrument.

BOVAR Western Research, an operating division of BOVAR Inc., designs, manufactures, sells and services quality analyzers and systems for process and environmental monitoring and control. BOVAR Inc. is a public company which provides environmental and waste management services internationally. BOVAR Inc. is traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the BVR ticker symbol.

CONTACT: Jim Staudt, BOVAR Inc., 508-686-8801, (fax) 508-686-8809

Next Generation Wind Turbine

Subject: UFTO Note – Next Generation Wind Turbine
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 1996 17:03:33 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

This Summary was prepared for UFTO by the Wind Turbine Company. Complete details on their business plan and technical approach are available from the company. The company is seeking business partners and equity investment capital.

——————————————–

THE WIND TURBINE COMPANY December 12, 1996

WTC’s 2-blade, downwind turbine design holds the promise of reducing the cost of wind generated electricity from its current level of 5¢/kWh to less than 3.5¢/kWh without resorting to available subsidies. WTC has significantly refined and improved upon the downwind design, incorporating proprietary technology, in a quest to reduce the initial turbine cost, the primary cost driver of wind energy, without sacrificing reliability. WTC’s turbine will weigh 60% as much as a comparably rated 3-blade, upwind turbine. Its lighter weight will permit WTC’s turbine to operate higher above ground (100 meters or more) than is economic for upwind turbines, thus exposing it to higher winds resulting in more energy production. Lower weight and higher energy capture combine to provide a substantial reduction in the cost of wind generated electricity.

WTC was selected by the Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DOE and NREL) to participate in Stage 2 (the hardware building stage) of the “Next Generation Turbine Development Project.” This is a $20 million project with the DOE picking up 70% of the cost. It will last 5-6 years. Two commercial wind turbines, the WTC 250 and WTC 1000, will be developed. As the result of its cost sharing, WTC will own all hardware produced.

A contract with NREL permitting work to begin on this project is expected by the end of December, 1996. To begin work, WTC needs to obtain initial funding for its share of the cost. WTC has identified two outside sources of funding and would like to identify one or two additional sources, one of which is ideally a strategic partner that can help commercialize the wind turbines when they are available.

The project will be executed in three phases corresponding to the development of three wind turbines:

In the “proof-of-concept” (POC) phase, WTC will manufacture and begin testing the POC 250, a 250 kW turbine. This turbine will demonstrate the technology that is novel to WTC’s design-WTC’s proprietary, hydraulically operated system in the turbine’s rotor that permits the cone angle between the blades to adjust depending on wind speed. Building the POC 250 will take approximately 12 months with an extended testing period to follow.

In the second phase WTC will develop the first full-scale 1000 kW turbine. This phase will begin in the second quarter 1998. During this phase, WTC will also develop an all new wind turbine blade for the 1000 kW turbine.

Concurrently, and independent of the NREL contract, WTC will refine the POC turbine with the intention of having the WTC 250 commercially available in early 1999.

3. The second full-scale turbine, the WTC 1000 production prototype, will be manufactured in the third phase. This turbine will be a commercial product.

To execute the project, commercializing the WTC 250 in parallel, WTC will have to raise approximately $12 million in equity funding over the next 5-6 years before reaching a break-even cash flow. This fund raising occurs in stages corresponding to the turbine development phases. Presently, WTC is raising $2 million by selling equity representing approximately 40% ownership of the Company. This will permit execution of the POC phase.

One of WTC’s current shareholders will participate in this financing, and WTC also expects a newly formed, electric utility-funded venture capital company to participate. Together these investors will account for a minimum of $1 million of the required initial funding, and could easily account for more. Both would like WTC to identify a strategic partner.

Markets for the WTC 250 and WTC 1000

The opportunity for the WTC 250 is in developing countries and in installations that are not grid connected. For example, the standard WTC 250 would be ideally suited for islands in the Caribbean, the Azores, etc., as well as mainland-based installations in Latin America and Asia. Primary considerations for this turbine are climates where fully weather protected maintenance is not critical, and where existing infrastructure such as roads, as well as the unavailability of large-size erection equipment, prohibit the installation of large wind turbines.

Many such installations are currently served by diesel generation units or are candidates for such units. Even in locations where diesel fuel is low cost, integrated wind/diesel systems will emit less pollutants and therefore should be viewed favorably by customers.

One modification to the WTC 250 which has been considered is the development of a cold weather version. Though the market for this wind turbine is a subset of the market for stand-alone systems, it is a high value opportunity. In many remote, cold weather locations, the cost of delivering diesel fuel is high.

WTC believes it can sell a limited number (20+/-) WTC 250 wind turbines in early 1999, generating its first revenue from commercial sales. Specific customers for these turbines have not been identified, however, a number of opportunities exist including the DOE/Electric Power Research Institute sponsored Turbine Verification Program. The US military is also known to be considering use of renewable energy technologies.

The opportunity for the WTC 1000 is large scale, grid connected applications. At present, and for perhaps the next 5-10 years, this market will be primarily in North America and “off-shore” in Europe. If the WTC 1000 achieves its cost and energy production targets, it will be competitive in the deregulated North American marketplace. Initially, it will displace higher cost sources of electricity from the grid when the wind is blowing. Storage technologies will eventually improve to the point where wind energy will become a major contributor in the North American electricity system.

During the next 3-5 years, however, there will be limited opportunities for new wind energy projects in North America as the generation industry deregulates and excess capacity is absorbed. This is the period during which WTC will be developing its new technology. By the time the WTC 1000 is available for commercial sale in the year 2000, the US market for low-cost wind energy will be rebounding.

The immediate opportunity for wind energy will be presented by the closure of aging nuclear power facilities. WTC believes the public will not accept a lessening of air quality as the price for a more competitive electricity market. Thus, in spite of an abundance of coal in North America, natural gas will to continue to be the fuel of choice. If the WTC 1000 achieves its cost objectives, electricity generators will turn their gas turbines off when the wind is blowing.

For more information please contact:

Larry Miles, President
The Wind Turbine Company
515 – 116th Avenue NE, Suite 263
Bellevue, WA 98004 USA
telephone: (206)637-1470
facsimile: (206)637-1483
email: MilesLW@MSN.com

UFTO WEB SITE (beta) up and running!

Subject: UFTO WEB SITE (beta) up and running!
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 09:02:10 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
| NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–

The UFTO Web site is operational, and ready for you to take a test drive. Go to: http://www.ufto.com

Behind the public home page, the good stuff is in a members only area requiring password access.

There you’ll find the UFTO TOPICS Database with a full feature search engine. It contains 408 data records of the UFTO Topics database, from the first results in 1994 thru to the DOE SBIR conference of October ’96.

1. The primary purpose of the web site, at least initially, is to provide access to the database.

2. It is for the use of UFTO member companies only. Anyone in your company can register to request access. This results in an email note to me. Then I need to access the server and add the user’s name and password, so this won’t be instantaneous. I’ll try to do this promptly, and notify you when they’re ready.

3. Please run the search engine thru its paces, and explore the data a bit, and let me know if you run into any snags.

4. The data is the same as you’ve seen in the UFTO Topics reports (e.g. T&D, Nuclear, etc.), and data records have been coded to enable you to select them by “Topic”, and essentially recreate updated versions of those Topic Reports.

5. It shows you a list of search hits and then you ‘view one record at a time’ — which is fairly standard. There will be future enhancements, particularly to provide better output capabilities.

So! Have a look! Let me know how it looks to you.

Positive Temp. Coeff. Polymers (PTC)

Subject: UFTO RFI — Positive Temp. Coeff. Polymers (PTC)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 19:17:40 -0800
From: Ed Beardsworth
TO: National Lab Contacts

**UFTO Request for Information ***
——————————–
Positive Temperature Coefficient Polymers (PTC)
——————————–

Is any research carried out in National Laboratories regarding Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) polymers?

These materials are made of polyethylene (or others polymers) and carbon. When the temperature is low the carbon atoms are very close and the resistance is low. When the temperature increases the distance between carbon atoms is bigger and the resistance increases rapidly.

Due to this very high positive temperature coefficient, the applications of such materials are essentially current limiters. These limiters might favorably replace circuit breakers in some cases. Are there any developments for low, medium and high voltage applications?

————————————————————–
| ** UFTO ** Edward Beardsworth ** Consultant
| 951 Lincoln Ave. tel 415-328-5670
| Palo Alto CA 94301-3041 fax 415-328-5675
|
| NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: edbeards@ufto.com
————————————————————–